US news outlets sue Microsoft and OpenAI: Everything you should know
On Tuesday, a group of eight US news publishers sued ChatGPT creator OpenAI and software company Microsoft for allegedly violating copyright when they used proprietary content to train their generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models. It happens months after The New York Times sued the businesses for related allegations. ET outlines the situation and the worldwide trend.
The New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, the Orlando Sentinel, the Florida Sun Sentinel, the California Mercury News, the Denver Post, the Orange County Register in California, and the Pioneer Press in Minnesota are the newspapers that are involved in the lawsuit.
What grievances do they have?
The news publishers have filed a lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI, claiming that the two companies have been “purloining millions of the publishers’ copyrighted articles without permission and without payment” and have been using the contents to train LLMs, which are the brains of chatbots like
How did OpenAI and Microsoft react?
OpenAI stated in a statement that the firm takes great care in its products and design process to support news organisations, while Microsoft has not yet responded.
“Although we were unaware of Alden Global Capital’s worries before, we are actively involved in positive collaborations and discussions with numerous news organisations worldwide to investigate prospects, address any issues, and offer solutions.
What was stated in the NYT suit?
The New York Times sued the two businesses in December 2023, claiming that they had trained their chatbots with copyrighted content worth “billions of dollars in statutory and actual damages,” and that the bots have since competed with the news organisation.
Are Indian news producers complaining about the same things?
To guarantee just pay for the use of their content to train GenAI models, Indian news publishers have proposed amendments to the Information Technology Rules.
The restrictions for non-commercial usage set forth by Hindi publishers, such as Dainik Bhaskar and Amar Ujala, prohibit AI businesses from using their digital content for model training without authorization.
More Stories
Reminiscent Reticence by Dr. Infini Lionne Book Review: A Quiet Journey Through Solitude, Memory, and Self-Acceptance
Reminiscent Reticence by Dr Infini Lionne is a deeply personal and contemplative poetry collection that reads like a private journal...
The soulful journey of Uma Ranganathan—where wisdom, whimsy, and everyday moments converge
Author Uma Ranganathan is living proof that moments of enlightenment canilluminate even the most ordinary lives - hers being one...
The Housemaid Remains a Favorite Among Readers -topped Good reads.
The Housemaid by Freida McFadden is still very popular with readers. It recently ranked among the most-read books on Goodreads....
International Booker Prize 2026 Shortlist Highlights Powerful Voices from Around the World
The announcement of the 2026 International Booker Prize shortlist once again demonstrates the profound impact of storytelling across languages and...
Reimagining Global Cinema: In Conversation with Rajesh Talwar
In this insightful interview with The Literature Today, award-winning author Rajesh Talwar reflects on his latest book “Bollywood, Hollywood And...
Book Review: Chaos, Confusion to Confucius by Snehashree Mandal
Title: Chaos, Confusion to ConfuciusAuthor: Snehashree MandalPages: 286Publisher: Locksley Hall PublishingBuy now In an era defined by uncertainty and constant...
